|
Post by Dubber on Dec 13, 2007 17:14:22 GMT -5
{Table updated to Reply #58 in Results thread (2007.12.27 @ 17:43 GMT)}
{Modified sort order: Points (Descending) -then- Losses (Ascending) -then- Kills (Descending) (2007.12.23 @ 00:31 GMT)}
{ Discuss }
{ table moved to Reply #45 }
|
|
spacca
Ronin Warlock
(Tchichi #2,342,106)
Posts: 55
|
Post by spacca on Dec 14, 2007 4:31:35 GMT -5
Nice work Dubber
|
|
|
Post by spez on Dec 14, 2007 11:14:24 GMT -5
seems to be a bit of confusion on my line. I have 4 games completed. (Biologin (win), Citanest (loss), Nawglan(win), Spleenboy(kill). Don't know where the numbers are funky though...
|
|
|
Post by Dubber on Dec 14, 2007 11:58:40 GMT -5
seems to be a bit of confusion on my line. I have 4 games completed. (Biologin (win), Citanest (loss), Nawglan(win), Spleenboy(kill). Don't know where the numbers are funky though... Here's what happened: 3 wins + 1 loss = 4 games played, 1 remaining 3 win - 1 loss = 2 + 1 for the kill = 3 Points Clear as mud? {No wait, I only have 3 games complete for you Spez? Which of your opponents is also short a game?}
|
|
|
Post by spez on Dec 14, 2007 13:22:32 GMT -5
The problem is : None of them is missing a game (if i counted correctly Spleenboy's games in the result page). I think you missed some other player's game, so that would explain why your totals are balancing...
|
|
|
Post by Dubber on Dec 14, 2007 15:30:49 GMT -5
{table moved to reply #46}
|
|
|
Post by Slartucker on Dec 14, 2007 16:22:31 GMT -5
The need for six columns still boggles me somewhat.
|
|
|
Post by Dubber on Dec 14, 2007 16:46:22 GMT -5
The need for six columns still boggles me somewhat. Sorry for boggling you, Slarty, I just didn't have the columns optimized for my sequential data entry project earlier today By the by, The table at the top of page 2 of this thread is (once again) fixed -- I had Rycchus down for an extra death and Loyus down for an extra loss. It was a spreadsheet manual coding error, that's all. *Poof* the semester is over for me - time for some brain rest...
|
|
|
Post by BioLogIn on Dec 19, 2007 17:15:32 GMT -5
So Spacca and ExDeath are both at 7 seven points. And Rycchus still has theoretical possibility of reaching them. What shall this be judged? Most kills? Least losses? First to finish all games? Popular vote? Judge decision? )
|
|
|
Post by ExDeath on Dec 19, 2007 17:49:58 GMT -5
No real reason why 2 or more people couldn't share the title. A new one is given out every month, after all.
|
|
|
Post by BioLogIn on Dec 19, 2007 18:19:21 GMT -5
exdeath none except you two will have to come up with a new "rule of a month" together )
|
|
|
Post by ExDeath on Dec 19, 2007 19:06:32 GMT -5
My rule would be simple - No summons allowed except elementals.
|
|
|
Post by Dubber on Dec 19, 2007 20:55:15 GMT -5
Newly updated through #51... Everyone seems happy with the data... Doublecheck me anyway, please {updated 2007.12.23 @ 00:02... Please recheck your data}
|
|
|
Post by Rycchus on Dec 20, 2007 14:29:50 GMT -5
What's your secondary sort, Dubber? Is it just random?
I haven't gone back to doublecheck the data, so I don't know if it's you that's out - could just as well be me - but I have Freesoul on 4 points (2K, 1W, 0DD/DS, 1S, 0Di) and awall on -4 (0K, 0W, 0DD/DS, 2S, 1Di).
|
|
|
Post by Dubber on Dec 21, 2007 8:22:57 GMT -5
What's your secondary sort, Dubber? Is it just random? Sort order is: Points(Decending), Kills(decending), Mage(Ascending) I haven't gone back to doublecheck the data, so I don't know if it's you that's out - could just as well be me - but I have Freesoul on 4 points (2K, 1W, 0DD/DS, 1S, 0Di) and awall on -4 (0K, 0W, 0DD/DS, 2S, 1Di). Good question, which is why I put my base data table in reply #20. If everyone would check their rows if Reply #20 and tell me if I goofed the data entry, then we could be more solid on the ranking table in reply #15. Many eyes checking are better than just a few.
|
|