|
|
Post by mikeEB on Oct 24, 2012 20:22:56 GMT -5
That actually makes sense. If two warlocks cast magic mirror on the same monster and a third bounces a paralysis off it, who should get credit?
|
|
|
|
Post by BioLogIn on Oct 24, 2012 22:39:12 GMT -5
mikeEB
Well, double Magic Mirror + para is ambitious even when cast at a warlock, not at a monster...
|
|
|
|
Post by Dubber on Oct 26, 2012 7:32:35 GMT -5
My (admittedly fuzzy) memories of this exact situation 4 or 5 years ago (holy ..., I've been playing this game almost a decade?! and still haven't hit 4,000 games played?!) is that the player who cast the mirror at the target of paralysis ended up with control of the spell... but, sometime in the last year (or possibly two) several spell interactions changed - I've been surprised a bunch of times at the resulting environment not matching my recall of priori incantati. If para from warlock A hits a monster owned by warlock B covered with a Magic Mirror cast by warlock B, paralysis is reflected and monster attacks, however warlock B doesn't get to choose a hand and warlock A is not paralysed next turn (although his hands "start to stiffen" on Magic Mirror turn). games.ravenblack.net/warlocks?num=80169&turn=19 |
|
