|
Post by Slartucker on Sept 10, 2007 11:08:18 GMT -5
The idea of publishing the teams would be so people can follow who's doing well in the contest. If anyone doesn't think it's a good idea, though, I want to respect that.
|
|
|
Post by Slartucker on Sept 10, 2007 12:32:06 GMT -5
Clarification: You probably shouldn't vote if you didn't submit a fantasy team! Your privacy isn't at stake here...
|
|
|
Post by Rycchus on Sept 10, 2007 16:00:39 GMT -5
I think all should be revealed at the end, including whose teams were whose.
I have no preference in the meantime.
|
|
spacca
Ronin Warlock
(Tchichi #2,342,106)
Posts: 55
|
Post by spacca on Sept 10, 2007 17:16:33 GMT -5
I think all should be revealed now. It is fun to see how your team is getting on.
|
|
Derfel
Ronin Warlock
Did I Do That?
Troublemaker
Posts: 283
|
Post by Derfel on Sept 10, 2007 17:18:27 GMT -5
I think team names should be revealed, and then after the tournament, reveal which person had which team...
|
|
|
Post by xade on Sept 10, 2007 19:14:50 GMT -5
I agree with the team names... except if anyone included their name in the team, you might want to ******** that out... (ps: if there is only one team that has stars in their name, it *totally* wasn't mine... )
|
|
|
Post by nawglan on Sept 10, 2007 21:26:13 GMT -5
_or_
List the players with teams... not the contents of the team... and a running score as games are completed. *shrug*
|
|
Derfel
Ronin Warlock
Did I Do That?
Troublemaker
Posts: 283
|
Post by Derfel on Sept 10, 2007 21:30:39 GMT -5
Yes - that last suggestion is probably the best!
|
|
|
Post by Slartucker on Sept 10, 2007 22:13:38 GMT -5
I do like that suggestion, Nawglan. I think I'll probably do that.
|
|
|
Post by Rycchus on Sept 11, 2007 8:17:28 GMT -5
Is that points per win, or two points per win or what?
Okay, never mind. I just worked it out.
Also, holy crap! One of my team is going to die horribly! *hasn't really looked at who went where until now*
|
|
|
Post by Rycchus on Sept 11, 2007 8:28:04 GMT -5
The highest score at the moment would be 14... Or 12 for a four-person team. Or 10 for a three....
|
|
|
Post by Slartucker on Sept 11, 2007 11:31:42 GMT -5
Yes, it is worth pointing out that the results as of round 1 will greatly favor teams with more players. By the end of the tournament, they will favor teams with better players, but to what degree is the question.
|
|
|
Post by nawglan on Sept 11, 2007 12:40:21 GMT -5
We should allow the unnamed teams to be named: I propose: Rasper's Home Boys, The Rycchus Posse, and The Thumb Twiddlers (for Taliesin's team).
|
|
|
Post by Rycchus on Sept 11, 2007 12:49:19 GMT -5
What if I don't want a posse?? You don't get to name my team for me! If it had a name, it wouldn't have my name in it. So nyuh!
|
|
|
Post by nawglan on Sept 11, 2007 12:54:31 GMT -5
So, pick a suitable name. 8) Looks lame to have a team named "--"
|
|