|
Post by BioLogIn on Jun 9, 2009 8:19:40 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by mikeEB on Jun 9, 2009 14:23:57 GMT -5
MikeEB vs. Ellipsisgames.ravenblack.net/warlocks?num=71756&full=1+1 for MikeEB: +0 double death -1 stabbed (3) +1 shield (4) +1 shield (7) +1 stab (13) +1 shield (14) +1 stab (15) -1 shield (17) -1 stab (28) -1 stab (29) +1 shield (30) -1 stab (31)
|
|
|
Post by Dubber on Jun 9, 2009 19:36:59 GMT -5
Dubber v Toyotamigames.ravenblack.net/warlocks?num=71757&full=1+9 for Dubber+10 win -1 t7 Toyotami '>' Dubber's goblin -1 t8 Toyotami charms Dubber into '>' against a 'P' +1 t11 Toyotami '>' into Dubber's 'P' -1 t13 Dubber '>' into Toyotami's 'P' +1 t14 Dubber charms Toyotami into '>' against Protection -1 t17 Toyotami charms Dubber into '>' against a 'P' +1 t18 Dubber '>' Toyotami+1 t19 Dubber '>' Toyotami-1 t20 Toyotami '>' Dubber's goblin {edited to add link}[or (if > at goblins don't count) +11 Dubber]
|
|
|
Post by vermont on Jun 9, 2009 21:12:19 GMT -5
Vermont vs Maknud
+18 for Vermont
+10 for winning +1 < (3) +1 < (4) +1 < P (5) +1 < P (7) -1 < monster (8) +0 dual stab (9) +1 < P (10) +1 < P (12) +1 < P (13) +1 < P (17) +1 < (19) -1 < (22) +1 < (23)
|
|
|
Post by ellipsis on Jun 11, 2009 1:13:54 GMT -5
Ellipsis vs BioLogIngames.ravenblack.net/warlocks?num=71753&full=1+10 in favor of Ellipsis+10 for victory +1 (T3 shield) +1 (T7 stab) +2 (T8 stab & shield) -2 (T9 stab & shield) -1 (T13 stab) +1 (T22 shield) +1 (T23 stab) -1 (T24 stab goblin) +1 (T29 stab) -2 (T30 stab & shield) -1 (T31 shield) -1 (T36 stab) +0 (T37 both stab ogre) +1 (T38 stab for the kill) epic stabbing was had (between the two of us we stabbed 20 times)
|
|
|
Post by Dubber on Jun 12, 2009 23:32:10 GMT -5
Dubber v Igrekgames.ravenblack.net/warlocks?num=71760&full=1+14 for Dubber+10 win +1 Dubber > success t5 +1 Igrek > into my protection t6 +1 Igrek > into my protection t7 -1 Igrek > success t8 +1 Dubber > success t9 +1 Dubber > success t10 +1 Igrek > into my P t10 +1 Igrek > into my P t11 -1 Dubber > into Igrek P t13 +1 Dubber > success t14 -1 Igrek > success t15 -1 Igrek > success t16 +/-0 Dual > success t17 +/-0 Dual > success t18
|
|
|
Post by mikeEB on Jun 14, 2009 19:10:27 GMT -5
MikeEB vs. Succatgames.ravenblack.net/warlocks?num=71932&full=1+14 for MikeEB: +10 for Succat's surrender (turn 27) +1 shield (turn 3) +1 shield (turn 4) -1 stab (turn 5) +1 stab (turn 14) +1 stab (turn 15) +1 shield (turn 15) +0 trading stabs (turns 16-18) +1 shield (turn 19) -1 stab on goblin (turn 24) +1 shield (turn 26) -1 shield (turn 27)
|
|
|
Post by mikeEB on Jun 15, 2009 11:40:26 GMT -5
Reported on behalf of ToyotamiToyotami vs. Salvorgames.ravenblack.net/warlocks?num=71783&full=1+7 for Toyotami: +10 for winning (36) -1 for being stabbed (2) +1 for stabbing Salvor (6) +1 for shielding Salvor's stab (7) -1 for stabbing Salvor's shield (8) +1 for shielding Salvor's stab (9) +1 for shielding Salvor's stab (11) -1 for being stabbed (15) -1 for stabbing Salvor's shield (16) -1 for letting Salvor stab a Troll (16) +1 for shielding Salvor's stab (17) +1 for shielding Salvor's stab (21) +1 for shielding Salvor's stab (22) +1 for shielding Salvor's stab (23) -1 for being stabbed (28) -1 for letting Salvor stab an Ogre (30) -1 for being stabbed (32) +0 double stab (33) -1 for being stabbed (34) -1 for stabbing a shield (34) -1 for stabbing a shield (35) Net modifier: -3
|
|
|
Post by BioLogIn on Jun 17, 2009 12:53:31 GMT -5
BioLogIn vs Vermontgames.ravenblack.net/warlocks?num=71877+16 to BioLogIn+10 for winning +1 > T6 +1 shield T7 -1 > T9 +1 > T10 +1 > T12 +1 > T20 -1 shield T21 +1 > T27 -1 shield T28 -1 > T31 +1 > T32 +1 > T33 +1 shield T33 +1 shield T35
|
|
|
Post by ellipsis on Jun 19, 2009 12:38:41 GMT -5
Ellipsis vs Saypingames.ravenblack.net/warlocks?num=71797&full=1+16 in favor of Ellipsis+10 for victory +1 (T2 >) +2 (T3 >P) +0 (T4 PP) -1 (T6 >) +1 (T9 >) +1 (T10 >Ogre) +1 (T12 >Ogre) +1 (T13 >) -1 (T15 P) -1 (T20 P) +1 (T21 >) +1 (T26 P) -1 (T28 P) +1 (T35 >Ogre) -1 (T36 POgre) -1 (T39 P) +1 (T48 P) +1 (T49 >Ogre) -1 (T50 P) +1 (T52 >Ogre) Note: We're not all using consistent notation, so I'll explain a little. ">" means a stab that lands, and "P" is a stab that's blocked, so ">P" means one person stabbed (and it landed), and the other stabbed but was blocked (the net score effect should indicate who was who). When a stab targeted a monster, the monster type immediately follows the > or P.
|
|
|
Post by xade on Jun 23, 2009 15:10:39 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by xade on Jun 23, 2009 15:10:55 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by vermont on Jun 25, 2009 16:57:03 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by salvor on Jun 26, 2009 5:27:17 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by ellipsis on Jun 29, 2009 2:51:11 GMT -5
|
|