|
Post by xade on Nov 25, 2008 23:58:11 GMT -5
woohoo! I call that a win!
|
|
|
Post by nawglan on Nov 26, 2008 0:13:36 GMT -5
And now there is a new controversy... Which is the real winner. Weighted or unweighted.
|
|
|
Post by xade on Nov 26, 2008 0:53:35 GMT -5
un-weighted... cause that's what the price difference at the start was meant to sort out. Who cares though, I call the win for both of them!
|
|
|
Post by BioLogIn on Nov 26, 2008 1:21:52 GMT -5
Woohoo. I call this WEIGHTED WIN! Seriously, though, number of players in a team has nothing to do with scoring here. The goal was to score as much points as possible. There were no limitations\bonuses for less players in team. So I'd say unweighted wins. nawglan I think it would be good to publish team members and team authors. It would be interesting reading.
|
|
|
Post by nawglan on Nov 26, 2008 12:33:01 GMT -5
I did. It's at the bottom of the first post of that thread.
|
|
|
Post by nawglan on Nov 26, 2008 12:36:56 GMT -5
The reason I provided weighted was that some of the stats really favored teams with more members. Turns, health, health lost, etc. Was a lot of fun. Though, next time, I want to allow substitutions between rounds (before the next round's roster is posted)
|
|
|
Post by BioLogIn on Nov 26, 2008 12:57:43 GMT -5
nawglan hey, you are copy-paste masta )) Check Brother and Arm listing, please =)
|
|
|
Post by nawglan on Nov 26, 2008 14:19:50 GMT -5
ROFL, will fix it.
Two things to note... no two teams are the same, and no person picked the perfect team.
|
|