|
|
Post by Dubber on Feb 2, 2008 22:45:25 GMT -5
| # | Mage | Points | Kills | Wins | Tied | Losses | Deaths | Completed | ToGo | | 10 | Citanest | 5 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 1 | | 7 | Freesoul | 5 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 0 | | 11 | awall | 5 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | | 13 | Vermont | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | | 6 | Reds | 4 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 0 | | 15 | BioLogin | 4 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | | 17 | xade | 2 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 0 | | 2 | vilhazarog | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 1 | | 23 | Rycchus | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 2 | | 19 | Emrys | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 2 | | 14 | BzAli | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 0 | | 12 | Toyotami | -1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 2 | | 24 | RedHot | -1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 1 | | 22 | Maven | -2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 0 | | 21 | Spez | -3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 2 | | 1 | Dubber | -4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 5 | 0 | | 5 | nawglan | -4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 1 | | 8 | succat | -5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 0 | | 16 | jes | -5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 0 | | 4 | McLizard | -8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 0 | | | TOTALS | 0 | 14 | 25 | 10 | 25 | 14 | 44 | 16 |
[/b][/td] [/tr][/table] |
|
|
|
Post by ExDeath on Feb 3, 2008 1:36:20 GMT -5
Oh man, you had me excited thinking a new month of pairings had been posted. Oh well...
|
|
reds
Ronin Warlock
Posts: 31
|
Post by reds on Feb 9, 2008 19:46:26 GMT -5
my 5 are going as well (still waiting for 3 players to accept...).
Games away!
R
|
|
|
|
Post by Rycchus on Feb 12, 2008 11:19:24 GMT -5
What's your secondary sort? It's clearly not total games won any more!
|
|
|
|
Post by Dubber on Feb 12, 2008 13:24:44 GMT -5
Per DECEMBER -- Standings Reply #15
{Modified sort order: Points (Descending) -then- Losses (Ascending) -then- Kills (Descending) (2007.12.23 @ 00:31 GMT)}Haven't changed it since (well, I add Losses & Deaths to get TotalLosses - which replaced "Losses") then. |
|
|
|
Post by BioLogIn on Feb 27, 2008 0:51:43 GMT -5
2Dubber
I see 4 ppl with 5 points, and two of them (Citanest and Vermont) have 1 game left. No clear winner so far.
After Feb. round ends we will calculate tiebreakers to see who is on top, won't we? Just to clarify things...
|
|
|
|
Post by vermont on Feb 27, 2008 9:58:25 GMT -5
At this points I'm doubting my match with redhot will finish on time. I'm not receiving too many updates. Although, to be fair, this match was one of the reschedules that didn't start until the midpoint of the month.
|
|
|
|
Post by Citanest on Feb 27, 2008 12:58:52 GMT -5
My Rycchus match will also probably not finish - not sure why, it started early. Maybe cos Rycchus is a weekday player and I'm more a weekender.
Ties are done by looking at opponent scores, right?
|
|
|
|
Post by Dubber on Feb 27, 2008 13:34:20 GMT -5
Per the League Description and Rules post:
"If you don't have time for all the battles, that's okay -- battles you don't start or don't finish are ignored."
I take the "ignored" to mean "don't show up in the results at all"
Which means if Vermont & Citanest both don't finish and all other players cannot mathematically achieve 5 points, then Vermont is teh February winnar...
|
|
|
|
Post by BioLogIn on Feb 27, 2008 13:37:10 GMT -5
but if they will have 5 points each, why Vermont is the winner then? did you calculated tiebreakers already?
|
|
|
|
Post by Dubber on Feb 28, 2008 15:59:02 GMT -5
Somebody other than me use Slarty's rules as you think they should be applied & call it  |
|
|
|
Post by BioLogIn on Feb 29, 2008 2:35:48 GMT -5
I'll make a few moves now and I'm out till Monday. So I pass, do whatever you'd like... and be glad I screwed in both of our ladder games due to hastily and sleepy playing )))
|
|
|
|
Post by Dubber on Feb 29, 2008 5:47:31 GMT -5
I modified my mechanical table sorting to take into account Losses, Deaths, & Ties. This is just for ease of displaying a rough look at the competition and how the points look.
Slarty's rules for determining tie breakers are in effect, as this league battle format really is his baby.
Ties are determined by number of points earned, no more or less (right?)
Tie breakers appear to be the sum of all opponent's final points, highest point value wins (right?)
Congratulations, awall, for your February League win!
|
|
|
|
Post by BioLogIn on Feb 29, 2008 6:00:44 GMT -5
Ties are determined by number of points earned, no more or less (right?) Tie breakers appear to be the sum of all opponent's final points, highest point value wins (right?) Right and right, at least that was how Slartucker solved december tie. And yes, I'm posting here instead of preparing my weekend event... so what? )) |
|
|
|
Post by awall on Feb 29, 2008 10:23:49 GMT -5
Hooray! I'll post a proposed rule for March shortly.
|
|
