reds
Ronin Warlock
Posts: 31
|
Post by reds on Feb 8, 2008 19:50:58 GMT -5
Well I don't think that would be an issue if Bio scripts the pairings.
The key issue is what do we think is better, actually that's not even the issue, as I believe Slarty thinks that the random pairing is better and this is still his show.
Though if there is an overwhelming amount of warlocks (and witches) that think elo groups or whatever system is better, and that the overhead is addressed (i.e. script) I am pretty sure Slarty would be willing to listen...
So back to the issue at hand. Is random better? Grouped elo? All opponents having the same avg. Elo (more or less)?
R
|
|
|
Post by freesoul on Feb 8, 2008 21:40:16 GMT -5
Random. Luck of the draw will keep people looking forward to the next round. We already have ELO and Ladder as an accurate measure of skill....
|
|
|
Post by vermont on Feb 9, 2008 20:28:25 GMT -5
I prefer random as well.
|
|
|
Post by BioLogIn on Feb 10, 2008 16:29:29 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Dubber on Feb 15, 2008 11:03:55 GMT -5
So, okay. We have a new player wanting to join in (Igrek) and I think I recall ExDeath saying he was taking off Feb (but I was lazy & didn't edit him out)
What say you, should we swap in Igrek for ExDeath for February? There are still 14 days to battle if we swap Igrek in. That should be enough time to complete the battles.
|
|
|
Post by BioLogIn on Feb 15, 2008 11:54:46 GMT -5
I thinks we definitely should.
|
|
|
Post by Citanest on Feb 15, 2008 11:56:59 GMT -5
go for it. too many people bailing this month, lets try to rescue it.
|
|
|
Post by vermont on Feb 15, 2008 15:23:43 GMT -5
But I really wanted a win vs exDeath Actually, I'm waiting on FOUR of my matches, so this would be nice.
|
|
|
Post by Dubber on Feb 17, 2008 14:36:38 GMT -5
The following Warlocks should re-check their pairings for February: awall BzAli Citanest Dubber Emrys McLizard nawglan RedHot Reds succat Toyotami Vermont xade
|
|
|
Post by xade on Feb 17, 2008 17:10:28 GMT -5
but... now I have to beat Awall, Toyo and Vil inn order to achieve the same score!!!
|
|
|
Post by Dubber on Feb 17, 2008 17:15:19 GMT -5
Well, in future, keep everyone from grumping about the pairings and battles not starting & you'll be fine PS Sorry about not adding you in Igrek
|
|
|
Post by xade on Feb 17, 2008 18:27:26 GMT -5
nah, I'm just playing with ya... I like battling, so the more the merrier. However, it sounds like we need to develop a slightly more sophisticated method of opting in/opting out. Perhaps we take out current set, put it in a sticky somewhere and then have people add there viability to be in/out there... no comments means maintaining the status quo, opt out for a month, and you're out til you opt back in... also, it prolly wouldn't hurt for a quick 1st of the month run round of players to see who is 2 weeks idle... I would be happy to do the monthly run arounds.
|
|
|
Post by Rycchus on Feb 18, 2008 12:51:13 GMT -5
I think it's fairly obvious if people say "count me out for March" or just "count me out"/"count me out for now/for a while" (i.e. something indefinite).
A runaround is a good idea. Say anyone more than 14 days inactive on the 1st has 3 days to get back to us on the forums before the tables are redone?
|
|