|
|
Post by vermont on Jan 12, 2009 23:03:10 GMT -5
So there's no significant advantage to winning your initial pairing by more than roughly three turns? (Yes, I know there there is (or at least could be) a strong advantage in having those three turns; I'm just pointing out that after that you are not rewarded for your swiftness.)
|
|
|
|
Post by Citanest on Jan 13, 2009 10:34:15 GMT -5
Hmm, I think my original plan to only allow specific spells to the waiting warlock is better. Counter, Shield, Protection, Remove, Cure. And maybe it would be better if the waiting Warlock couldn't be targeted.
Well, even if it isn't practicable I think it's a fun idea. I might come back to it another time.
|
|
|
|
Post by vermont on Jan 13, 2009 11:22:42 GMT -5
Perhaps at least cure wounds would be acceptable...then there is a concrete advantage for taking your opponent out quickly.
|
|
|
|
Post by xade on Aug 16, 2010 21:33:03 GMT -5
Bump- so, I liked this idea, but it never got any agreeance on the transition period.
Anyone want to give it a crack with the following rules.
Waiting Warlock can cast the following- Counter, Shield, Protection, Remove, Cure, Mirror.
Waiting warlock can be targetted.
Monsters can be brought into the next duel.
|
|
|
|
Post by ourjake on Aug 17, 2010 11:25:39 GMT -5
i'm always up for it
|
|
|
|
Post by mikeEB on Aug 17, 2010 11:41:22 GMT -5
Waiting Warlock can cast the following- Counter, Shield, Protection, Remove, Cure. Waiting warlock can be targetted. Add mirror to the list; otherwise, the waiting warlock might end up eating a FoD when an active warlock defends it with invisibility or mirror threat. |
|
|
|
Post by vermont on Aug 17, 2010 13:38:50 GMT -5
xade, I'd be up for trying it.
|
|
|
|
Post by xade on Aug 17, 2010 22:40:53 GMT -5
Alright, Mirror is added. So we got Vermont, OurJake and... Mike- was that a volunteer? Or just a comment?  |
|
