|
|
Post by freesoul on Dec 1, 2007 17:41:40 GMT -5
Well, I have to say, I love the pairings this round. Paired with a bunch of high quality openents. Looking forward to it!
good luck all!
|
|
|
|
Post by xade on Dec 1, 2007 18:42:11 GMT -5
heh when I saw my pairings, I thought to myself... man, tough luck xadie...
But looking at everyone else, there's not really any easy run here.
Which will make the results interesting...
|
|
|
|
Post by vermont on Dec 1, 2007 20:35:10 GMT -5
Agreed. There are lots of good players in the league. Should be fun!
|
|
|
|
Post by Rycchus on Dec 1, 2007 20:58:56 GMT -5
Oh my, Maven.
I think Spacca got off lightly.
Great to see Slarty and ExDeath at it again too...
What does everyone think the best and worst pairings are, then?
|
|
|
|
Post by BioLogIn on Dec 2, 2007 2:23:00 GMT -5
I think the Loyus guy got the most tough pairings -- ExDeath, Awall, Vermont, Reds, Toyotami means at least 3 top players and no beginners at all.
As for the easiest one... Spacca's pairings are obviously one of "the best" - no ExDeath, Slartucker, Awall, xade, Rycchus or Toyo (and no Spacca too =)).
I must say that IMHO pairings are very balanced overall. So good luck to all of you guys =)
|
|
laxen
Ronin Warlock
Posts: 77
|
Post by laxen on Dec 2, 2007 6:55:22 GMT -5
um slarty under xade, laxen is one of his pairings, but he does not feature in my pairings list at all...
therefore i'm not quite sure which matches to start and which not to!!!
laxen
|
|
|
|
Post by BioLogIn on Dec 2, 2007 7:08:30 GMT -5
After checking all pairings:
Xade has Laxen as an opponent, but Laxen doesn't has xade listed.
Awall has Toyotami as an opponent, but Toyo doesn't has Awall listed.
Toyotami and Laxen are listed as opponents for 6 people.
Awall and xade are listed as opponents for 4 people.
My suggestion is that xade and awall must play each other (instead of their matches VS laxen and toyo respectively). So the pairings IMO should be like that:
Xade -- Rycchus, Freesoul, Dni, Awall, Citanest
Awall -- Freesoul, Xade, McLizard, Sojobo, Loyus
(This duel would add more flavor to this league round as well )))
|
|
laxen
Ronin Warlock
Posts: 77
|
Post by laxen on Dec 2, 2007 8:03:15 GMT -5
i agree with you there- after checking all of my own pairings, i realised that i was down for 5 and a half so kinda assumed that the xade one wasn't actually a pairing- i didnt check which one was the one xade was missing tho, good detective work Bio  HOWEVER, i think we should wait for slarty to get back to us before we do anything. just to be on the safe side.  . |
|
|
|
Post by BioLogIn on Dec 2, 2007 8:07:49 GMT -5
Of course, everything I wrote is not official at all, it is just my personal opinion on the situation.
Slartucker will fix the situation as he will see fit.
|
|
|
|
Post by Slartucker on Dec 2, 2007 9:43:08 GMT -5
GAH. And it was so easy. Guess I won't be using this tournament scheduler to do pairings anymore.
Fixed, just as BioLogIn suggested -- it was the simplest fix.
|
|
laxen
Ronin Warlock
Posts: 77
|
Post by laxen on Dec 2, 2007 11:18:45 GMT -5
and so we continue on our rocky roads leading to the same goal... league of mages domination... (mmm rocky road... chocolate cravings... ) |
|
|
|
Post by xade on Dec 2, 2007 15:25:59 GMT -5
welll darn, tht just made things harder... (PS: RE-MATCH!!!)
|
|
|
|
Post by awall on Dec 2, 2007 17:07:12 GMT -5
An unofficial tiebreaker, eh? Bring it on.
I wonder, with D/P outlawed, are we both going to open F/P this time?
|
|
|
|
Post by Dubber on Dec 3, 2007 11:50:24 GMT -5
Is it only one battle per pairing?
Double deaths needing to be redone, Yes?
If one player goofs and breaks monthly league rule can a do over be offered?
I didn't see these addressed in the Rules, so I'm asking.
|
|
|
|
Post by Slartucker on Dec 3, 2007 12:20:39 GMT -5
One battle per pairing -- period. Ties are not redone. (Frankly, a tie is a legitimate result, and it's one of the problems of an elimination tournament that it can't accept a tie.)
Do-overs are, I suppose, at the discretion of the players involved. This is casual, remember.
|
|
.